Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EShakti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted Deleted after I speedy tagged it (non-admin closure). SwisterTwister talk 08:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

EShakti

EShakti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not be notable; no reliable secondary sources. Reads like an advertisement and is not possible to fix. Okamialvis (talk) 20:29, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:30, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 October 31. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

• Delete as corporate spam; an overly detailed product brochure in the guise of a Wikipedia article. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.