So that's the article that explains it all. Alright, thank you, it's what I wished to know but couldn't find, despite searching and looking some Fandom pages too.

The creator of the Riddle School series is JonBro. Is there anything going on with JonBro? I'm not understanding any of this stuff that user TheCompleteSmester put forward.

You're on NG, it's the Razor Queen.

The original made by the author of the game:

https://web.archive.org/web/20190117190042im_/https://picon.ngfiles.com/610000/flash_610455.jpg?f1363842114

The piece of garbage that came up today:

https://picon.ngfiles.com/610000/flash_610455.webp?f1724412435

I don't know how it works, someone doing this, but you can't put a spoiler, with the ending of the story GIVEN AWAY, right there as the thumbnail! The author did not originally mean to spoil the ending of the game in the thumbnail. You're not the author of the game, you don't decide what goes on the thumbnail.

The name seems a tad silly to me (and some three people already brought up some "Shadow Wizard" because of it, something that I'm not sure what Newgrounds has to do with or what it is). Thinking about it, Fund Tank, Capital Tank or Backer Banker is what hits me.

Let's see what happens...

From the creator of Submachine, which I kept messaging until they finally posted this one as well.

Sorry for sort of double posting. I'm looking for a medal game that I can no longer find. See here. I'm sure that the top medal hunters played and know this game perfectly. Was it really deleted? Thanks for any insight.

I'm looking for a game that I can't find anymore. It was probably deleted. It was likely a Unity game, only working around the time that it was made. It was a Flappy Bird copy, pale green colored, with basic flat square graphics, a hard difficulty and Newgrounds medals. It was played by jumping consecutive pillars successfully. It was satiric by being purposely low quality and spam like. It had unlockable mostly animal characters in the form of white squares, with satiric jump sounds, which made up the medals. It played a catchy retro loop song. It was titled as something in the likes of "Squared."

My understanding is that this initiative came from the Archive's 25th anniversary. They're looking into the future another 25 years. :)

wayforward.archive.org/?site=newgrounds.com

This site [newgrounds.com] contains information that is currently classified as Thought Crime in your region.

(Explanation spoiler: it's one of those net neutrality initiatives, that Fulp sometimes supports.)

According to NG Logs, I earned an approximate average of 25 blams per day in March and 41 in April. However unbelievable it may be, the numbers show an actual gain of 41 blams per day. One year ago in May, my average of blams per day was of little under 11 (I didn't change my ways). It's likely that there are correspondingly a lot more saves going on as well, which just means a lot more submissions.

We're back to #239 and #91, as expected. *shrugs*

Thanks for the update. Unfortunately, today I dropped from experience rank #240 to #532, from one moment to another. Do you know anything about this? Will it return to normal tomorrow? I had been in the 200s for a long time. It coincided with the end of the double experience run. The system must be glitched. (Also, not April's fools.)

Videos don't play on that page.

It doesn't work at all in both outdated Chrome and outdated Firefox, whereas the old player did. Normally websites have some tolerance for users without the latest browser version, as dropping support altogether is overkill. Nobody's saying IE6, but Firefox 52 and Chrome 61 aren't that extreme to support and almost everything still works well in them. They were some of the last browser versions to support Flash properly for one reason or another.

It's basically a sponsor. If you notice, their name comes up on the games that they submit. If being a sponsor isn't allowed, then a huge chunk of Newgrounds would have to go, as hundreds and hundreds of submissions are posted by the sponsor accounts. I could go on and on showing you lots of accounts with big hits that you would be deleting. What happened was that they submitted one game that was already uploaded. Pretty much like PastelGames uploading something Mateusz-Skutnik already had.

It took all this long, but I tried it out again to confirm it. Since I abstain from saves, I can easily tell if I get a save point. I voted 0 by mistake (with a thumbnail like that...) and then changed it to a positive rating. No protection save point was awarded one day later when the submission passed judgement. The other way around (saving and changing to blamming) I never tried.

This Sunday was the third one with a lot of blams, setting up a potential new pattern, where Fridays and Saturdays have little blams, but Sundays have the most of all days.

Because of the potential interest, here's some information on blams presently, as this way it gets noted down here how they were going at this point in time. Although the obituaries are very important, they don't work well for these stats: each of the many days to be checked has to be manually added up and a lot of work is needed to exclude from the count all of the submissions that moderators send to the obituaries everyday already past judgement and submitted at any point in time, as those don't award blam points.

Thanks to NG Logs, I was able to check how many blams I earned in the last 30 days: 324 blams at an average of 10.8 per day (definitely with some margin of error for the precise end and start points). My gain in blams that the next hexalist update #61 will show will be almost the same thing as this, but, this way, I can post these stats some 25 days sooner. I normally miss a couple of blams everyday, as they happen overnight. To know how many, I checked out the unvisited links on the obituaries, excluding the submissions that moderators blammed. Unnecessarily, here's the amount of blams that I missed each day: 2, 6, 0, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 0, 8, 2, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 4, 5, 4, 6. Basically, totaling 63, it's consistently 0, 1 or 2 misses. In the oldest days, there are a few higher figures because I wasn't yet fully dedicated and there's a day with 3 that should have likely been 1, as I wasn't able to patrol for some time. Besides that, there's only a 6 and an 8 on the last two weekends, which is curious. By accounting for these missed blams, the actual numbers for this last month are: 387 blams at an average of 12.9 per day (with some margin of error for the precise end and start points).

Overall, Fridays and Saturdays seem to have few blams. I don't think that blams need to be attended too quickly, except verges of death when waking up. If moderators unpublish or remove under judgement submissions instead of blamming them there are less points around, and it could have to do with the moderator's preference. Subscribe to the Elite Guard Barracks topic for submission reports, although it seems that none are getting blammed. If you change the vote on a submission (which is a modern possibility), it seems that it's not accounted for.

Surprise! Thanks for the update and previous work.

I'm next with the same thing. It should take 3 months to show up on the list. I think the rate is around 10 blams a day (I only started getting blams seriously around the beginning of the month, so comparing the increase to the previous update is no good).

On the list's own page, the user Simon is wrongly linked to http://hexalist.ngpot.com/speed%20up%20firefox instead of their profile.